| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
LT Alter
TunDraGon
33
   |
Posted - 2012.12.04 22:12:00 -
[1] - Quote
Just curious as I find the new one, while it may look cooler it just doesn't display information well enough. I have to look REALLY closely for a few seconds to notice exactly what my target has for shield armor or hull. It doesn't have that ability to glance at it like the old one. If anything I hope CCP implements the option to use the old version if you want to.
Thoughts on this? |
LT Alter
TunDraGon
35
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 22:48:00 -
[2] - Quote
I see some people like it while a majority does not, if anything I feel CCP should release an option to return to the old version or at least have something similar to it. I hate to think what it is like for my friend who is over 50 years old that plays this game and PVP's regularity just how hard it is to see what his target's status is. That is unless he invites him to fleet so he can add him to watchlist so he can actually tell... |
LT Alter
TunDraGon
35
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 22:50:00 -
[3] - Quote
Fractal Muse wrote:I totally prefer the new one.
It is so much better.
You'll get used to it. The way I see it, if you found the old bars giving you information quickly then once you get used to this one you'll be getting information super fast!
I have been using the new one all day, it is not a case of I feel it looks dumb. It is too small, and the bars are way to small. I can't tell what my opponents status is on his armor shield and hull. It is a problem for me and other people like me. |
LT Alter
TunDraGon
35
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 22:54:00 -
[4] - Quote
Conrad Makbure wrote:The new one hands down, it takes some adjustment from the old, but an improvement nonetheless.
If they improved it's visibility in some way I would be happy with it. It is not that I'm a cold bitter vet who needs eve to never change. There is just a problem with the new one that simply put needs to be fixed. |
LT Alter
TunDraGon
35
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 22:58:00 -
[5] - Quote
I have nothing against people liking the new one over the old one. Though it is apparent that many have the same view as me, and it is a majority. CCP needs to create an option for those that don't like it to change it and for those that like it to keep it. That is the best fix for everyone. |
LT Alter
TunDraGon
35
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 23:35:00 -
[6] - Quote
Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:LT Alter wrote:I see some people like it while a majority does not,... Way to jump to conclusions based upon almost nothing. You should get a job as a professional poll taker. 
Those with higher level brains realize I am talking about those who have taken the time to post a constructive comment in the thread. You go look back and tell me what number dislikes this and what number likes it and you will find a majority. Thanks for your oh so constructive comment. |
LT Alter
TunDraGon
35
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 23:37:00 -
[7] - Quote
Johan Civire wrote:Always those QQ people in this forum... No the new UI is great love it. This change was announced 1 month ago or even more in the dev post READ IT FOR ONES. The only problem is and always is that people have problems with new things if old things are change.... Get over it or gtfo.
I saw the first version and started a similar thread with similar responses, even got a dev post and the next weekend I saw they changed it in to a second version that actually reduced the ability to see it further and made the problem worse. I do read them, I do pay attention, but most of all I don't tell other people to 'get over it or gtfo'. I ask for compromise that caters to both sides. |
LT Alter
TunDraGon
35
|
Posted - 2012.12.04 23:52:00 -
[8] - Quote
Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:LT Alter wrote:Yusef Yeasef Yosef wrote:LT Alter wrote:I see some people like it while a majority does not,... Way to jump to conclusions based upon almost nothing. You should get a job as a professional poll taker. Those with higher level brains realize I am talking about those who have taken the time to post a constructive comment in the thread. You go look back and tell me what number dislikes this and what number likes it and you will find a majority. Thanks for your oh so constructive comment. ...And that is nowhere near enough info to propose that a company spend resources to allow dual funtionality. To suggest otherwise is,... Silly.
A small example gives reason to gain a bigger example. CCP has followed that rule using the forums because less than a fourth (probably less) post regularly on the forums. If they see a trend on the forums they will expand their search. I have already talked to many of my PVP friends and they have much the same view as I and I see a trend. I'm posting on the forums to see if there is a trend here and there is. Information is cumulative and if you see multiple upon multiple of the same trend change is in the wind. Support me in my efforts not for the fact that you are fine with how the change has effected you, but for the fact that many are not so. |
| |
|